The RMT's rejection of East West Rail's Driver Operated Only (DOO) proposal has sparked a heated debate in the rail industry. This decision comes after months of negotiations and a perceived breakthrough between the union and Chiltern Railways. The union's General Secretary, Eddie Dempsey, expressed strong opposition to the proposed role of Customer Service Inspector, arguing that it undermines the safety-critical role of the guard and supports the controversial DOO method. This move has raised concerns about the future of rail safety and the union's commitment to protecting workers' rights.
The proposed Customer Service Inspector role, based at EWR's Bletchley depot, would handle customer care, revenue protection, and on-train announcements. However, it would not include the responsibility of opening train doors, which would still be operated by drivers. This distinction has led to the RMT's rejection, as it means some services could be operated without a second person onboard, potentially compromising safety.
Dempsey emphasized the union's policy of opposing DOO extensions, citing the need for a second 'safety-critical' member on board. The RMT plans to hold mass meetings and lobby local MPs to gather support for their cause. They also demand that the Department for Transport (DfT) reverses its DOO plans and ensures all trains have a second safety-critical member.
The dispute extends beyond the DOO proposal. Issues with the handover of Winslow station from Network Rail to Chiltern Railways persist, with Network Rail securing a small piece of land for a secondary escape route. However, the station and car park have not been handed over, causing further delays and financial strain, with £2.6 million in costs accumulated due to the stabling of six Class 196s.
Chiltern Railways, the operator of the first stage of East West Rail, acknowledges the challenges but remains committed to the project. They have started recruiting station and operational staff to support the new route's introduction. However, the company emphasizes that there is still work to be done to prepare the trains and finalize operating arrangements.
The RMT's stance raises important questions about the balance between efficiency and safety in rail operations. As the industry continues to evolve, finding a harmonious solution that respects workers' rights and ensures passenger safety will be crucial. The outcome of this dispute could significantly impact the future of rail services and the relationship between unions and rail operators.
